Friday, May 8, 2015

PB3A

The Christopher Columbus Myth
       
     In America, Thanksgiving is a time for celebration and to show gratitude to our lives. In classrooms across the country, elementary kids dress us as “Indians” and pilgrims while making turkeys out of assorted colors of construction paper. And this is Thanksgiving as we know it right? Well, the story of Christopher Columbus and the “discovery” of the Americas as we’ve learned about it in grade school is far from the truth. A lot of national holidays are quite skewed actually now that I think about it…But never the less, we did not learn the truth behind this story until we grew older, but even then we have been told a very Eurocentric version. Yes, I understand that telling 8 year olds about mass genocide and stealing land from the Native Americans may be a bit gruesome, but it’s the truth isn’t it?
            Jim Charles addresses several myths regarding Native Americans and Christopher Columbus in his peer- reviewed, academic journal entitled “Out of the Cupboard and into the classroom: Children and the American Indian Literary Experience.” The genre of this source is a scholarly publication. In order to tailor to a younger audience, I can change the genre to a story book to tell the story of Thanksgiving. For an older audience, I will go with a newspaper article, preferably an opinion editorial so that I can give my personal thoughts on the subject.
            Considering we are telling this story to children, we will keep it G rated. But that doesn’t mean completely altering the truth so that Columbus looks like the good guy. The point of view of my story book would be told through the eyes of a Native American child. This way, the reader can identify with the main character a little better. I would address the myths listed by Charles and tell what actually happened. For instance, Myth number 1 states: “When Columbus arrived in the Americas, the land was largely uninhabited.” I would say that in fact, there was diversity and culture throughout the land. I would include colored illustrations of the Native Peoples in everyday life. Their homes, families, food practices, etc. The story might get sad though because I would want to add the population decrease from 15 million to less than 1. I would have the main character notice that there are less people where he or she lives and that the majority had gotten sick to demonstrate European disease.  But nothing too dramatic because I wouldn’t want to traumatize the kids haha, but I do think it’s important for them to know this is the truth!
            In my newspaper article, I would address that I don’t think it’s fair for children to learn this version of Thanksgiving and the “discovery” of “Indians.” First of all, how can one man discover a continent that is already inhabited with people who have been thriving on the land. He may have stumbled upon it ACCIDENTLY, thinking it was India. (He didn’t even have the correct location, issue #1). Basically my article would probably end up being one big rant on how I agree with Charles in his journal. I would like to see what other people have to say about my article as well. If it was online, I’d want to see comments from others to make it more interactive and open to discussion. This you can’t really accomplish with a younger audience.

            This is how I would take an academic journal and transform it into two different genres while still remaining true to its content. 

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Painting Trees

Question 1: What decisions did these artists make? What similarities / differences .....
Response: Each artist has a set goal in mind when painting or drawing. With this goal in mind, they use techniques to achieved the image they have in their head to put the final product on paper. For instance, Bob Ross wants snow covered mountains so he purposely adds white and adjust his brush strokes to create the perfect outcome. Each artist is similar because they all started with a blank canvas. What is different is the final product of each tree because each artist has his own style. For example, Bob's paintings are easy to identify because he uses the same techniques for each of his paintings even if the landscape is different every time.

Question 2: How could you characterize their styles, and what impact does that have on you?
Response: When I'm watching Bob I recognize a certain sound when he paints. It's like a distinct scratching of his paint brush. He also narrates in a monotone voice over every detain in his portrait. The Disney painters are a little more go-with-the flow when painting, They submerge themselves in nature itself so they are influenced by their surroundings. I think this is a good tactic because the artist is able to use all his senses into one final product.

Question 3: How have they described their moves?
Response: The artists of the Disney video talk about lighting and how they use different colors to accent shadows and certain features of the trees. They use specific tactics that allow their paintings to pop. The narrator even notes how all 4 artists' paintings came out differently even though they were painting the same tree. This is because of the different moves they made and possibly their level of skill.

Q&A Responses

Okay I'm a little lost, but here are my responses......

Question 1:  So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go?  What were you happy with?  What weren’t you?  Why?  Be specific!
Response: 
In the end, I was pretty happy with the way my WP2 went. I'm never 100% fully satisfied with my end work, but this is just a personal factor about myself. I was happy with my topic and I think I found pretty decent sources. I feel like I might have been repetitive AGAIN, but I'm still working on that. I find it hard not to be redundant especially in lengthy papers. This time I only used 2 reader examples, whereas last time I used 3. But this prompt was a little more trickier to tie-in other readers, or maybe that's just me. Overall I'd say I'm pretty content with it. 

Question 2: Q2. Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you?  Why?
Response:
The comments that I found helpful were the ones regarding re-wording my sentences so that they make sense to other readers. Sometimes it's hard for writers to tell whether the point they're trying to make makes sense to others, which is what I sometimes struggle with. So receiving that feedback was most helpful especially in my introduction paragraph. Also just small grammar mistakes that I didn't catch are helpful. Sometimes I read my work too fast and skip over spelling mistakes so it's nice when someone else corrects me.

Q3. What did you think about yesterday’s digital Peer/Reader Review sesh?  Better/worse/same as the “old school” hard copy one?  Please explain
I enjoyed yesterday's sesh. I'd rather comment on each other's papers digitally versus physically. I think it was cool that we utilized google docs because it kept my attention as opposed to me reading a paper copy of each essay. It was just easier overall to me. 
It also makes it easier to edit my final draft because it's already online and I can just refer back to the google doc and word doc if I need to copy and paste anything. Also we saved a ton of paper :)